I came across an article recently called “The Unspoken Truth: Economic Policy is Environmental Policy” by Donna Kohut where she explains that economic policies go hand in hand with environmental outcomes, even though they are often treated as separate issues. We tend to separate economic growth and environmental protection as if they’re opposing forces, but this piece makes it clear: they’re deeply connected.
The article highlights how economic development projects impact air quality, water resources, and even job stability, whether we acknowledge it or not. Pennsylvania, for example, has historically relied on fossil fuels, leading to pollution and economic instability as these industries decline. The article also points out that industries often ignore the true costs of their actions, like the healthcare expenses from toxic emissions or the loss of clean drinking water. If something doesn’t have a price tag, the market simply doesn’t account for it.
One thing that stood out to me was how other states, like Texas and Ohio, are already pivoting towards renewable energy and clean-tech manufacturing, not necessarily for environmental reasons, but because it makes economic sense. Pennsylvania, on the other hand, is at risk of being left behind. The report calls for policy changes, like reforming the Department of Community and Economic Development (DCED) to prioritize industries that support both workers and the environment. If Pennsylvania were to begin making changes in its economic policy, its environmental state would benefit as a byproduct.
Even though these two come hand in hand, why do we still treat environmental protection as a trade-off rather than an investment? What can other states’ success stories teach us about making sustainability a driving force for economic growth? Changes in our economy affect our everyday life and future just as much as our changing ecosystems, sea levels, and other environmental factors do. The article made me realize that every decision about jobs, industries, and development isn’t just about the economy; it’s about the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the future we’re inheriting. If we keep relying on outdated fossil fuel policies, we’re not just harming the planet—we’re risking economic instability too. If some states are able to make a beneficial change, all states should be able to. In fact, all places around the world should be striving for a cleaner, more efficient, and stable future. The push for clean energy and the principles of the circular economy are what can create positive change in a multitude of areas.
If we rethink economic policy, we don’t just protect the environment—we create a stronger, more stable future in many aspects. It’s time to stop acting like we have to choose between the two.
Impact Blueprint 